Ethical Aspects of Creating Robots with the Function of Physiological Interaction with a Person
ЭТИЧЕСКИЕ АСПЕКТЫ ПРОИЗВОДСТВА РОБОТОВ С ФУНКЦИЕЙ ФИЗИОЛОГИЧЕСКОГО ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЯ С ЧЕЛОВЕКОМ
This academic paper examines the ethical, social, and biomedical implications of creating and using robots with physiological and sexual interaction capabilities with humans. It reviews various researcher positions, ranging from critical ethical concerns regarding women's rights and objectification to utilitarian views seeing such technology as a natural market and social progression. The author analyzes these technologies through the lenses of bioethical principles and Maslow's hierarchy of needs.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
Researchers, ethicists, and academics interested in the social, moral, and bioethical implications of emerging social and sexual robotics.
What the document contains
The document covers the ethical, social, and psychological dimensions of human-robot physiological interaction, specifically focusing on sex robots and social robotics. It details statistical market trends, surveys regarding public expectations and gender divides, arguments from prominent researchers on both sides of the debate, and the application of bioethical frameworks and Maslow's hierarchy of needs to robotic technologies.
The text does not provide binding legal regulations, regulatory enforcement mechanisms, or technical standards for robot manufacturers.
- The market for social and interactive robotics, including entertainment and sex robots, is experiencing rapid global growth.
- Researchers are deeply divided, with critics citing risks of objectification, infringement on women's rights, and inappropriate interfaces, while proponents view these technologies as a natural technological and social evolution.
- Surveys indicate distinct gender differences in the acceptance and stated willingness to use sex-oriented robots.
- Biomedical ethics principles such as autonomy, informed consent, integrity, and vulnerability can be applied to evaluate the impact of human-robot physiological interaction.
- Interaction with robots can be mapped onto Maslow's hierarchy of needs, satisfying physiological, safety, belonging, and esteem requirements.
· Introduction and growth statistics of social and entertainment robotics · Overview of international discussions and expert perspectives · Analysis of negative positions on sex robots (e.g., Kathleen Richardson) · Analysis of positive and naturalistic positions on sex robots (e.g., David Levy, Helen Fisher) · Application of biomedical ethics principles and Maslow's hierarchy of needs · Conclusion
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Accountability
0/5Clear responsibility for AI outcomes
N/A
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Dignity
3/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
Кэтлин Ричардсон из Универ- ситета Монфорта в Лестере, Великобритания, является активным про- тивником женского и детского андроидного интерфейса секс-роботов, так как она воспринимает их как ущемление прав женщин и видит в них опасность распространения педофилии.
Main text
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Oversight
0/5Humans remain in control of consequential decisions
N/A
screening score · 2026-10-23
Privacy
0/5Protection of personal data and private life
N/A
screening score · 2026-10-23
Enforcement
0/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
N/A
screening score · 2026-10-23