Back to the database
Record STMT-WEF2F9AAdvisory

Ethical Regulation of Robots Must Be Embedded in Their Operating Systems

Position paper ProfessionalGlobalin force

This academic chapter argues that ethical and legal control of future AI and robots will be dangerously brittle unless computational deontic logics or moral principles are embedded directly at the operating-system level. Authored by researchers from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, it emphasizes that logic-based ethical engineering is essential for dependable machine moral reasoning. The work is published as part of a construction manual for robot ethical systems.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

SpringerIndustry
Publisher
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityProfessional
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsAI developers and providersAI deployers and users

Researchers and AI developers interested in the theoretical and technical integration of ethics into artificial intelligence systems.

Sectors
Research and science · artificial intelligence and robotics research

What the document contains

What's covered

The text covers the theoretical necessity of integrating formal moral reasoning and computational deontic logics into robot operating systems.

What's missing

It does not provide statutory regulations, binding governmental policies, or enforceable legal codes.

Key takeaways
  • Ethical control in robots and AI must be woven into the operating-system level to avoid brittle behavior.
  • Computational deontic logics and formal verification methods are necessary to mechanize moral and legal principles.
  • Logic-based ethical engineering provides a rigorous foundation for machine moral reasoning.
Outline
· Abstract
· Reference and Publisher Information
· Author Affiliations
· References
Issued2015
Length1,672 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

robot_ethics operating_systems formal_verification deontic_logic ai_safety