Executive Order 14365 of December 11, 2025 Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence
This executive order establishes a national policy framework aimed at preventing inconsistent state-level artificial intelligence regulations and maintaining United States global AI dominance. It directs the Department of Justice to create an AI Litigation Task Force to challenge state AI laws that unconstitutionally regulate interstate commerce or conflict with federal policy. Furthermore, it tasks the Department of Commerce, the Federal Communications Commission, and the Federal Trade Commission with evaluating state laws, restricting certain federal funding for non-compliant states, and developing preemption standards.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
Federal agencies, state governments, and AI developers and deployers operating within the United States.
What the document contains
The document addresses the preemption of state-level artificial intelligence regulations, the establishment of a Department of Justice litigation task force to challenge state AI laws, federal evaluations of state legislation, restrictions on federal grant and broadband funding for non-compliant states, and the development of federal reporting standards and FTC policy statements regarding AI model outputs.
The text does not provide technical safety benchmarks, ethical guidelines for AI development, or specific regulatory frameworks for data privacy outside of preemption considerations.
- The federal government aims to replace a fragmented patchwork of state AI laws with a uniform national framework.
- An AI Litigation Task Force will be established within 30 days to challenge state AI laws deemed inconsistent with federal policy.
- The Department of Commerce will evaluate state AI laws and restrict certain non-deployment broadband funds for states with onerous regulations.
- The FCC and FTC are directed to explore federal reporting standards and policy statements concerning the preemption of state laws that mandate altered AI model outputs.
- Federal officials will jointly prepare legislative recommendations for a permanent uniform federal policy framework.
· Sec. 1. Purpose · Sec. 2. Policy · Sec. 3. AI Litigation Task Force · Sec. 4. Evaluation of State AI Laws · Sec. 5. Restrictions on State Funding · Sec. 6. Federal Reporting and Disclosure Standard · Sec. 7. Preemption of State Laws Mandating Deceptive Conduct in AI Models · Sec. 8. Legislation · Sec. 9. General Provisions
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Accountability
1/5Clear responsibility for AI outcomes
States with onerous AI laws identified pursuant to section 4 of this order are ineligible for non-deployment funds
Section 5(a)
screening score · 2026-10-23
Fairness
2/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
a new Colorado law banning ‘‘algorithmic discrimination’’ may even force AI models to produce false results
Section 1
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Dignity
0/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Oversight
0/5Humans remain in control of consequential decisions
screening score · 2026-10-23
Privacy
0/5Protection of personal data and private life
screening score · 2026-10-23
Transparency
2/5Openness about how AI systems work and are used
Federal Reporting and Disclosure Standard. Within 90 days of the publication of the identification specified in section 4 of this order, the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission shall, in consultation with the Special Advisor for AI and Crypto, initiate a proceeding to determine whether to adopt a Federal reporting and disclosure standard for AI models that preempts conflicting State laws.
Section 6
screening score · 2026-10-23
Impact Assessment
4/5Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use
publish an evaluation of existing State AI laws that identifies onerous laws that conflict with the policy set forth in section 2 of this order
Section 4
screening score · 2026-10-23