Record STMT-WEBACBBAdvisory

Montenegro

Report ProfessionalSouthern Europe · MEin force

This report by the International Bar Association examines the current state of artificial intelligence in Montenegro's legal sector as of June 2024. It details the lack of a formal national AI definition or dedicated AI legislation, noting that regulation will likely align with the EU AI Act through the Stabilisation and Association Agreement. The report also highlights how independent law firms, international law firms, and in-house counsel utilize AI tools differently, and discusses the roles of professional bodies in guiding future AI adoption.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

International Bar AssociationProfessional

Lead issuer

Legal forceAdvisory

Under whose authorityProfessional

Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Professional groupRegulatorsCompaniesResearchers and academics

Legal professionals, policymakers, and researchers interested in the intersection of artificial intelligence and legal service regulation in Montenegro.

Sectors

Justice · legal services

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers the integration, practical applications, regulatory outlook, and professional governance of artificial intelligence within the legal sector of Montenegro.

What's missing

There are no formal definitions, enacted dedicated AI statutes, or public court decisions regarding AI in Montenegro's legal system at the time of publication.

Key takeaways

Montenegro currently lacks a formal legal definition of artificial intelligence and dedicated AI legislation.
Montenegro's future AI regulatory framework is expected to align with the EU AI Act via the Stabilisation and Association Agreement.
The use of AI tools in Montenegro's legal sector is in its early stages, primarily utilized by larger and international law firms for document automation and research.
Data protection and intellectual property issues regarding training data present significant challenges similar to EU GDPR requirements.
National professional bodies like the Bar Association are positioned to guide ethical AI use and develop future guidelines for legal practitioners.

Outline

· 1. What is the understanding or definition of AI in your jurisdiction?
· 2. AI tools and use cases in practice for legal services
· 3. Differences in AI use across independent law firms, international law firms, and in-house counsel
· 4. Current or planned regulatory approach to AI
· 5. Current or planned regulations on general AI and machine learning use
· 6. Free data access issues related to AI
· 7. Court decisions on AI in legal services or other sectors
· 8. Status of sectoral legislation on AI in the legal profession
· 9. Role of national bar organisations and professional institutions

IssuedJune 2024

Length2,108 words · 6 pages

FormatNot recorded

Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

2/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

fostering trust and accountability in the AI ecosystem.

4. What is the current or planned regulatory approach to AI in general?

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

1/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

focusing on issues such as data privacy, the accuracy of AI- generated information and the prevention of bias.

9. What is the role of the national bar organisations

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

1/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

it is crucial to balance these advancements with the need to uphold human judgment and ethical considerations central to the practice of law.

8. What is the current status

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

3/5

Protection of personal data and private life

The Personal Data Protection Act delineates procedures for processing and safeguarding personal data, particularly pertinent to AI systems utilising such data.

5. What are the current or planned regulations on the general use of AI

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

1/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

This alignment might involve adopting standards similar to those proposed in the EU AI Act, which emphasises risk management, transparency and accountability in AI applications.

8. What is the current status

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

1/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

Key responsibilities include enhancing professional and ethical standards, developing the legal profession, and bolstering professional discipline and accountability among its members.

9. What is the role of the national bar organisations

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

3/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

focusing on risk assessment, compliance requirements, and fostering trust and accountability in the AI ecosystem.

4. What is the current or planned regulatory approach to AI in general?

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

Physical AI Governancesupporting

artificial_intelligence legal_services regulation data_protection european_union