Back to the database
Record STMT-WE70171Advisory

EROS Ethical Robotic Systems. A Multi-level Framework for Integrating Ethics in Robotics and AI

Framework Institutional policyGlobaladopted

This academic chapter proposes the EROS (Ethical Robotic Systems) framework to bridge abstract ethical guidelines with practical applications in robotics and artificial intelligence. Based on an empirical study utilizing Grounded Theory and Actor-Network Theory across 29 qualitative items, the research identifies a hybrid multi-level robot actor-network of individual, corporate, collective, and im-material actants. It provides actionable solutions for ethical engineering to help successfully integrate ethics in industrial robotics.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

SpringerIndustry
Publisher
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityInstitutional policy
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsCompaniesAI developers and providers

This is for researchers, engineers, and developers looking to understand how to integrate ethics practically into robotics and AI systems.

Sectors
Research and science · robotic engineeringManufacturing and industry · industrial robotics

What the document contains

What's covered

The document addresses the integration of ethics into industrial robotics and AI systems through a multi-level framework called EROS, examining actor-networks and responsibility distribution based on empirical qualitative research.

What's missing

It does not provide specific legal compliance mandates, government regulatory enforcements, or binding administrative penalties for non-compliance.

Key takeaways
  • Robot and AI systems in industrial settings form a multi-level robot actor-network composed of individual, corporate, collective, and im-material actants.
  • Current robot and AI ethics often lack reinforcement mechanisms and effective application-oriented tools.
  • The proposed EROS framework bridges abstract normative codes with concrete actions from robotic and AI engineering.
  • The findings are grounded in an empirical study of 29 qualitative items, including expert interviews, expert talks, and narrative interviews.
Outline
not stated
Issued25 February 2024
Length1,556 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

3/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

The trends of increasing intelligent automation and connectivity lead to transformations and challenges, especially in the realms of ethics and responsibility.

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

robot_ethics ai_ethics actor_network_theory responsible_engineering industrial_robotics