Record STMT-WD8ED2ASoft law

The Robots Assert Their Rights

THE ROBOTS ASSERT THEIR RIGHTS

Report State lawEastern Europe · RUadopted

This monograph collects papers from the First Far Eastern International Forum dedicated to the digital transformation of society, public power, law, and the state, specifically focusing on autonomous robotic technologies and artificial intelligence. It examines doctrinal and legal foundations as well as moral and ethical standards related to the use of robotic technologies and AI. The volume features contributions from numerous academic authors analyzing legal, philosophical, and social dimensions of digital reality.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Publishing Center RIORIndustry · RU

Publisher

Legal forceSoft law

Under whose authorityState law

Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsGeneral publicProfessional group

Specialists in law, political science, philosophy, and anyone interested in the digital transformation of modern society.

Sectors

Research and science · legal and socio-humanitarian research

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers the legal, moral, ethical, and socio-philosophical issues surrounding the development and application of autonomous robotic technologies and artificial intelligence systems.

What's missing

It does not provide binding statutory regulations, enforcement mechanisms, or specific technical standards for AI deployment.

Key takeaways

The monograph addresses doctrinal and legal foundations and moral standards for autonomous robotic technologies and AI.
It is based on contributions from the First Far Eastern International Forum focusing on digital transformation.
The publication covers philosophical, political, and legal aspects of applying end-to-end digital technologies.
It serves as a resource for specialists in law, political science, and philosophy studying societal digital transformation.

Outline

· Abstract
· Keywords
· Representatives
· References

Issued10 March 2020

Length6,633 words

FormatNot recorded

Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

2/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Liability for Damages Caused by Artificial Intelligence

References

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

2/5

Protection of personal data and private life

Data privacy law: An international perspective

References

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

2/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

addressing the transparency gap in search engines

References

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

Physical AI Governancecontext

robotics artificial_intelligence legal_foundations ethics digital_transformation