CEIAI Governance Database
Back to the database
Record STMT-WCE41C8Unknown

National Artificial Intelligence Strategy Committee

국가인공지능전략위원회

Strategy UnknownEastern Asia · KRin force

The National Artificial Intelligence Strategy Committee serves as a key governance framework in South Korea focused on driving national AI policies, advancing industrial capabilities, and coordinating cross-sector initiatives. The webpage provides an official portal into the committee's strategic direction, organizational structure, and coordination efforts for artificial intelligence development.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

President of the Republic of KoreaGovernment (executive) · KR
Lead issuer
Legal forceUnknown
Under whose authorityUnknown
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

National governmentPublic sector bodiesAI developers and providersAI deployers and usersResearchers and academics

Government officials, researchers, and industry stakeholders looking to understand South Korea's national AI strategy and institutional leadership.

Sectors
Telecommunications and digital services · artificial intelligencePublic administration · national governance

What the document contains

What's covered

National AI policy coordination, strategic planning, and cross-sector governance mechanisms managed by the committee.

What's missing

Detailed technical standards, enforcement penalties, and specific compliance guidelines are not provided in the text.

Key takeaways
  • The National Artificial Intelligence Strategy Committee coordinates national AI policy across sectors.
  • The committee aims to strengthen South Korea's competitiveness in artificial intelligence technologies.
  • It acts as a primary institutional body for high-level decision-making regarding AI development.
Outline
Not stated
IssuedNot recorded
Length377 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

artificial_intelligence national_strategy governance_framework digital_economy public_administration