Back to the database
Record STMT-WCA849CAdvisory

Robot, let us pray! Can and should robots have religious functions? An ethical exploration of religious robots

Position paper State lawGlobalin force

This academic article explores the philosophical and ethical dimensions of whether robots can and should have religious functions. It examines existing religious robots, discusses potential objections such as the lack of consciousness or religious experience, and highlights benefits like increased inclusivity and addressing existential questions. Finally, it outlines ethical challenges and proposes initial criteria for the development and deployment of religious robots.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

SpringerIndustry
Publisher
University of TwenteAcademic · NL
Contributor
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityState law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsAI developers and providersAI deployers and usersReligious community

Researchers, ethicists, theologians, and developers interested in the intersection of artificial intelligence, robotics, and religion.

Sectors
Religion and culture · religious robotics and spiritual practicesResearch and science · ethics and philosophy of robotics

What the document contains

What's covered

The article addresses whether and how robots can perform religious practices and functions, the ethical and theological objections to religious robots, the advantages they offer to religious communities and social robotics, and the specific ethical challenges associated with their deployment.

What's missing

The text does not provide legally binding governance rules, statutory regulations, or technical standard specifications for manufacturing religious robots.

Key takeaways
  • Religious robots are an emerging field that combines philosophy, religious studies, and robotics to perform functions like prayer accompaniment and religious education.
  • While defining religion and proving robot consciousness or religious experiences present major challenges, a practical approach focusing on religious practices allows robots to participate in religious contexts.
  • Religious robots offer significant advantages, including personalized services, broader access for vulnerable or isolated individuals, and a novel medium to address existential questions.
  • The deployment of religious robots raises complex ethical challenges regarding autonomy, responsibility, deception, theomorphic design, human-robot intimacy, and diversity.
  • Future development of religious robots should adhere to high-quality standards, incorporate theological expertise, ensure user-centered design, and avoid replacing human relationships.
Outline
1. Introduction
2. Robots and religion
3. Can robots have religious functions?
4. Should robots have religious functions?
5. Ethical challenges
6. Discussion
7. Conclusion and outlook
Issued11 December 2023
Length14,890 words · 17 pages
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

3/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

It is debated who bears the responsibility for the robot and its actions within human–robot interaction, especially if something goes wrong

5 Ethical challenges

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

3/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

Robot ethics encompasses the issue of discrimination and the imperative for diversity in the development and implementation of robots. However, this concern remains inadequately addressed in non-religious robot ethics so far

5 Ethical challenges

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

3/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

these ethical challenges present themselves anew in the context of religious robots. Since, as previously noted, there is no existing research on the ethics of religious robots

5 Ethical challenges

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

2/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

Debates revolve around whether robots can act autonomously or how human autonomy can be preserved during interactions with robots.

5 Ethical challenges

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

2/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Therefore, education about the functioning of a robot and responsible design is needed, so it is not assumed that one is dealing with divine powers instead of a program.

5 Ethical challenges

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

religious_robots robot_ethics spirituality social_robots artificial_intelligence