Record STMT-WC63AD9Soft law

Panorama de la Inteligencia Artificial en México: Hacia una Estrategia Nacional

PANORAMA DE LA INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL EN MÉXICO: HACIA UNA ESTRATEGIA NACIONAL

Report Institutional policyLatin America and the Caribbean · MXin force

This report provides an updated assessment of the state of artificial intelligence in Mexico, reviewing international trends, national digital development, public policies, and the regulatory ecosystem. It builds upon a 2018 benchmark report to offer strategic recommendations for formulating a National AI Strategy and implementing regulatory sandboxes. The study is supported by the United Kingdom's Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office and coordinated in collaboration with Mexican digital security and law institutions.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Academia Mexicana de Ciberseguridad y Derecho Digital A.C.Civil society · MX

Lead issuer

Foreign, Commonwealth & Development OfficeGovernment · GB

Funder

Legal forceSoft law

Under whose authorityInstitutional policy

Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

National governmentRegulatorsPublic sector bodiesResearchers and academics

Policymakers, regulators, researchers, and public sector leaders seeking strategic guidance and empirical insights for developing Mexico's national artificial intelligence policy and regulatory architecture.

Sectors

Cross-sectorTelecommunications and digital services · digital transformation and information technologyResearch and science

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers an international review of AI principles, declarations, indices, and regulatory frameworks, alongside a thorough mapping of Mexico's digital development, open data initiatives, cybersecurity posture, higher education offerings, and public sector adoption of AI.

What's missing

It does not establish binding statutory laws, enforceable judicial penalties, or a finalized, government-enacted National AI Strategy, functioning instead as a diagnostic report and set of policy recommendations.

Key takeaways

Mexico requires an overarching National AI Strategy that integrates long-term state planning beyond single presidential terms.
Regulatory sandboxes are highlighted as critical collaborative tools for regulators to understand AI technologies and foster innovation without compromising fundamental rights.
Open data policies and robust digital connectivity infrastructure are foundational enablers for successful AI adoption in both the public and private sectors.
The country faces notable gaps in specialized AI talent, technical infrastructure funding, and dedicated regulatory frameworks.
Multi-stakeholder collaboration among government, academia, civil society, and industry is essential to establish ethical, human-centric AI governance.

Principles it states

Human-centric development respecting human rights and fundamental freedomsEthical, transparent, and responsible AI deploymentInclusion, diversity, and sustainabilitySafety, security, and robustness in AI systems

Outline

· Introducción
· Resumen Ejecutivo
· Capítulo I: Recomendaciones del Documento Hacia una Estrategia de IA en México
· Capítulo II: Panorama Internacional de la Inteligencia Artificial
· Capítulo III: Panorama Nacional (México): Mapeo de Iniciativas, Avances en Política Pública, Regulación y Ecosistema
· Conclusiones

Issued2024

Length46,249 words · 69 pages

FormatNot recorded

Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

4/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Mantener la responsabilidad por el funcionamiento de los sistemas de IA y el cumplimiento de los Principios, considerando el papel y el contexto de los actores de la IA.

ORGANIZACIÓN PARA LA COOPERACIÓN Y EL DESARROLLO ECONÓMICO (OCDE)

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

4/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

Respetar los derechos humanos, la privacidad, la no discriminación y la justicia durante todo el ciclo de vida de la IA.

ORGANIZACIÓN PARA LA COOPERACIÓN Y EL DESARROLLO ECONÓMICO (OCDE)

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

4/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

Respeto, protección y promoción de los derechos humanos, las libertades fundamentales y la dignidad humana,

ORGANIZACIÓN DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS PARA LA EDUCACIÓN, LA CIENCIA Y LA CULTURA (UNESCO)

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

4/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

Las decisiones de vida o muerte no deben delegarse a las máquinas. Pedimos una mejor cooperación digital con múltiples partes interesadas

Asamblea General de Naciones Unidas

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

4/5

Protection of personal data and private life

Ante todo, se deben proteger la intimidad de los pensamientos y la privacidad de los datos contra los SIA, sobre todo aquellos que imponen juicios morales

Declaración de Montreal para un Desarrollo Responsable de la Inteligencia Artificial (2018)

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

4/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Comprometerse con la transparencia proporcionando información significativa sobre las operaciones y decisiones de los sistemas de IA.

ORGANIZACIÓN PARA LA COOPERACIÓN Y EL DESARROLLO ECONÓMICO (OCDE)

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

4/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

La Evaluación del impacto ético: se define como una herramienta de la Recomendación sobre la Ética de la Inteligencia Artificial, es un proceso estructurado que ayuda a los equipos de proyectos de IA

ORGANIZACIÓN DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS PARA LA EDUCACIÓN, LA CIENCIA Y LA CULTURA (UNESCO)

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

artificial_intelligence national_strategy regulation public_policy regulatory_sandbox