Back to the database
Record STMT-WC3720AAspirational

From an Eco-Relational Approach to Ecologically Responsible Robot Ethics

Position paper Institutional policyGlobaladopted

This academic commentary responds to critiques of the author's previously proposed eco-relational approach in robot ethics. It addresses methodological differences concerning ethical concepts versus systems and explores the transition toward an ecologically responsible framework that accounts for non-human entities. The author emphasizes the need to bridge philosophical relational approaches with applied ethics and law rather than maintaining a separation.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

SpringerIndustry
Publisher
Legal forceAspirational
Under whose authorityInstitutional policy
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsProfessional group

Researchers and ethicists studying the intersection of robot ethics, philosophy of technology, and environmental ethics.

Sectors
Research and science · robot ethics and philosophy of technology

What the document contains

What's covered

The document addresses philosophical critiques of the eco-relational approach in robot ethics, discussing relational methodologies, non-human agency, and the transition toward ecologically responsible frameworks.

What's missing

The text does not provide specific regulatory standards, legal enforcement mechanisms, or concrete technical guidelines for robot development.

Key takeaways
  • An eco-relational approach asserts that human relationality with non-human entities like animals and technology must be considered at a deep, fundamental level.
  • Traditional ethical concepts such as autonomy, agency, and responsibility should be disrupted and expanded to include non-human entities from the beginning.
  • Connecting environmental ethics with technology ethics is essential for addressing future challenges in robot ethics.
  • Practical implementation of eco-relational and non-anthropocentric approaches presents significant challenges that require further research.
Principles it states
Eco-relationalityNon-human agencyEcological responsibility
Outline
· 1 Introduction
· 2 The Eco-Relational Approach in Robot Ethics
· 3 The Variety of Relational Approaches
· 4 Consequences of an Eco-Relational Approach: From Eco-Relational to Ecologically Responsible
Issued2 July 2024
Length2,343 words · 5 pages
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

2/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

In robot ethics, ethical concepts and considerations such as autonomy, agency, and responsibility are often based on properties such as consciousness, sentience, and intelligence

Section 2

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

robot_ethics eco_relational_approach non_human_agency environmental_ethics technology_ethics