Back to the database
Record STMT-WC1CD38Soft law

AI Guidelines for Business Ver1.2

Guidelines State lawEastern Asia · JPin force

The AI Guidelines for Business (Ver. 1.2) provide unified guiding principles for AI governance in Japan to promote the safe and secure utilization of artificial intelligence. Issued jointly by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, the document establishes non-binding soft law guidance across the AI lifecycle for developers, providers, and business users. It integrates foundational human-centric philosophies, risk-based agile governance models, and alignment with international frameworks like the Hiroshima AI Process.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Ministry of Internal Affairs and CommunicationsGovernment (executive) · JP
Lead issuer
Ministry of Economy, Trade and IndustryGovernment (executive) · JP
Co-issuer
Legal forceSoft law
Under whose authorityState law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

CompaniesPublic sector bodiesAI developers and providersAI deployers and users

AI business actors including developers, providers, and business users operating in Japan who need guidance on safe and responsible AI implementation.

Sectors
Cross-sector

What the document contains

What's covered

The document details foundational philosophies, core guiding principles, and specific operational responsibilities for AI developers, providers, and business users across the AI lifecycle. It covers risk management, security measures, bias mitigation, transparency, privacy protection, and agile governance implementation.

What's missing

The guidelines are non-binding soft law and do not impose direct legal penalties or statutory enforcement mechanisms.

Key takeaways
  • The guidelines establish unified non-binding soft law principles for AI governance in Japan to balance innovation and risk reduction.
  • Three distinct AI business roles are defined and addressed: developers, providers, and business users.
  • A risk-based approach and agile governance model are emphasized to handle rapidly evolving AI technologies.
  • The document integrates international frameworks, including the Hiroshima AI Process International Guiding Principles.
  • Core principles cover human-centric values, safety, fairness, privacy protection, security, transparency, and accountability.
Principles it states
Respect for human dignity and autonomy of individualsDiversity and inclusionSustainabilitySafetyFairnessPrivacy protectionEnsuring securityTransparencyAccountability
Outline
Contents
Preface
Part 1 Definitions
Part 2 Society to aim for with AI, and matters each AI business actor works on
Part 3 Matters Related to AI Developers
Part 4 Matters Related to AI Providers
Part 5 Matters Related to AI Business Users
Issued31 March 2026
Length19,011 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

4/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

When developing, providing, or using an AI system or service, it is important that each AI business actor executes its accountability

Part 2, C. 7)

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

4/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

During the development, provision, or use of an AI system or service, it is important that each AI business actor makes efforts to eliminate unfair and harmful bias and discrimination

Part 2, C. 3)

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

4/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

Based on the social context of AI use, respect human dignity and the autonomy of individuals.

Part 2, C. 1)

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

4/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

Ensure controllability that allows humans to control AI as necessary including periodic and objective monitoring and handling

Part 2, C. 2)

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

4/5

Protection of personal data and private life

It is important that during the development, provision, or use of an AI system or service, each AI business actor respects and protects privacy in accordance with its importance.

Part 2, C. 4)

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

4/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

When developing, providing, or using an AI system or service, based on the social context when the AI system or service is used, it is important that each AI business actor provides stakeholders with information

Part 2, C. 6)

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

4/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

Each AI business actor first conducts an environment and risk analysis for the AI system or service based on the benefits and risks

Part 2, E

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

ai_governance risk_management agile_governance generative_ai human_centric_ai