Record STMT-WAB864AVoluntary

Estratégia de Implantação da Inteligência Artificial pelas Defensorias Públicas do Brasil

Strategy Institutional policyLatin America and the Caribbean · BRexpired

This document outlines the proposed unified strategy of the Brazilian Public Defender's Offices (Defensorias Públicas) for the implementation of artificial intelligence technologies to enhance access to justice and institutional efficiency. It addresses potential social and human impacts, data protection, transparency, algorithmic bias, and human oversight. The initiative opened a public consultation to gather contributions from civil society, experts, researchers, and public servants between December 2023 and June 2024.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Conselho Nacional das Defensoras e Defensores Públicos-GeraisOther

Lead issuer

Defensoria Pública da UniãoGovernment

Co-issuer

Ministério da Justiça e Segurança PúblicaGovernment (executive) · BR

Contributor

Legal forceVoluntary

Under whose authorityInstitutional policy

Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Public sector bodiesGeneral publicAI developers and providersAI deployers and usersResearchers and academics

Public defenders, legal professionals, public administrators, researchers, and members of civil society interested in the integration of AI within the Brazilian justice system.

Sectors

Justice · public defender officesPublic administration

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers the strategic intent, anticipated benefits, social risks, and technical governance considerations for implementing artificial intelligence across federal and state public defender offices in Brazil. It explores use cases like legal drafting assistance, document summarization, and citizen interaction channels, while detailing questions around data sovereignty, open-source versus proprietary models, and continuous training.

What's missing

The document does not provide binding legal regulations, mandatory technical standards, software code, or finalized enforcement mechanisms, as it serves as a consultative proposal and strategic framework.

Key takeaways

The Brazilian Public Defender's Offices aim to formulate a unified strategy for implementing artificial intelligence to improve institutional efficiency and access to justice.
The document highlights both the potential benefits of AI in automating repetitive legal tasks and the significant risks, including algorithmic racism, mass surveillance, and labor displacement.
Data protection, algorithmic transparency, and human oversight are established as core principles for any AI tool adopted by the institutions.
The strategy proposes creating a unified repository of training data, favoring solutions aligned with national needs and Portuguese-language contexts.
A public consultation process was launched to collect feedback from society, researchers, and experts on 15 specific questions regarding AI implementation.

Principles it states

Responsabilidade éticaTransparênciaColaboraçãoProteção de dadosDefesa dos direitos humanos

Outline

· Apresentação e Contexto
· Impactos sociais e humanos da Inteligência Artificial
· Inteligência artificial na Defensoria Pública
· Estratégia de implantação da Inteligência Artificial
· Perguntas para Consulta Pública (1 a 15)

Issued21 December 2023

Length3,715 words

FormatNot recorded

Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

3/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

assegurar que as soluções de inteligência artificial não reproduzam preconceitos e, ao contrário, possam contribuir para a promoção dos direitos humanos a partir da atuação da Defensoria Pública?

PERGUNTA 7

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

3/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

assegurando a supervisão humana de todas as etapas em que for necessária

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

3/5

Protection of personal data and private life

respeitando os parâmetros da Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

3/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

a transparência algorítmica também deve ser aplicada às soluções a serem adotadas ou desenvolvidas.

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

2/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

A expectativa é a recepção de críticas, sugestões e comentários sobre impactos sociais e humanos da inteligência artificial

Resumo

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

artificial_intelligence public_defender access_to_justice algorithmic_bias public_consultation