CEIAI Governance Database
Back to the database
Record STMT-W9E440CAdvisory

Legislative Tasks for Supplementation Prior to the Enforcement of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Basic Act

인공지능(AI) 기본법 시행 전 보완을 위한 입법 과제

Report State lawEastern Asia · KRin force

This briefing report from the National Assembly Research Service (NARS) analyzes legislative tasks for complementing the AI Basic Act prior to its implementation. It reviews the legislative progress, main contents, and key issues such as the National AI Committee, high-impact AI concepts, and AI business operator obligations. Finally, it suggests improvement measures including strengthening AI governance policy coordination, refining high-impact AI definitions, and differentiating obligations based on business types.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

National Assembly Research ServiceGovernment
Lead issuer
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityState law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

LegislatorsNational governmentRegulatorsResearchers and academics

Legislators and policy researchers looking for an analytical overview and improvement strategies regarding South Korea's AI Basic Act.

Sectors
Telecommunications and digital services · artificial intelligencePublic administration · legislative research

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers the legislative progress and key issues surrounding South Korea's AI Basic Act, including the National AI Committee, high-impact AI concepts, and business obligations, while proposing improvement strategies.

What's missing

It does not contain full statutory text or binding administrative regulations, as it is a research briefing report analyzing policy directions.

Key takeaways
  • The report examines legislative tasks needed to complement the AI Basic Act before its implementation.
  • It highlights issues such as the establishment of the National AI Committee, high-impact AI definitions, and AI business obligations.
  • Key improvement proposals include strengthening AI governance execution capabilities and refining high-impact AI legal requirements.
  • It emphasizes expanding resources like GPUs, talent, and data centers alongside supporting the adoption of AI in manufacturing.
Outline
· 1. AI 기본법의 제정 경과
· 2. 주요 내용 및 쟁점
  (1) 국가인공지능위원회 설치
  (2) 고영향 AI 개념 신설
  (3) AI 사업자 의무
  (4) AI 기술개발 및 산업육성
· 3. 개선 방안
  (1) AI 거버넌스의 정책 조정·집행 능력 강화
  (2) 고영향 AI의 개념·요건 구체화
  (3) AI 사업자 유형에 따른 의무 차등화
· 4. 향후 전망과 입법 전략
Issued4 March 2025
Length298 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

2/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

고영향 AI 개념 신설

2. 주요 내용 및 쟁점

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

artificial_intelligence ai_basic_act ai_governance high_impact_ai legislative_tasks