Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
The Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, adopted by UNESCO in November 2021, establishes a universal normative framework to guide the ethical development and deployment of artificial intelligence systems. It sets out foundational values centered on human rights, human dignity, environmental flourishing, diversity, and peaceful societies. Furthermore, it outlines specific principles such as proportionality, safety, fairness, transparency, and human oversight, accompanied by concrete policy actions across multiple domains.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
This document is primarily for Member States, policymakers, AI actors, researchers, and public and private sector organizations seeking ethical guidance for AI development and governance.
What the document contains
The document covers comprehensive ethical guidance for artificial intelligence across its entire lifecycle, addressing issues such as human rights, data protection, environmental impacts, gender equality, cultural diversity, education, labour markets, health, and governance frameworks.
It does not provide a single permanent definition of artificial intelligence, nor does it establish binding international enforcement mechanisms or criminal penalties, relying instead on voluntary state adoption and multi-stakeholder implementation.
- The Recommendation provides a global standard-setting framework grounded in international law to ensure AI systems work for the good of humanity and the environment.
- It establishes core values centered on human dignity, human rights, environmental flourishing, diversity, and peaceful societies.
- Key principles include proportionality, safety and security, fairness and non-discrimination, privacy, human oversight, transparency, and accountability.
- It details concrete policy actions covering ethical impact assessment, data policy, governance, international cooperation, education, economy, labor, and health.
- Member States are encouraged to apply the provisions voluntarily through appropriate legislative, regulatory, and administrative measures adapted to their constitutional practices.
· PREAMBLE · I. SCOPE OF APPLICATION · II. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES · III. VALUES AND PRINCIPLES · IV. AREAS OF POLICY ACTION · V. MONITORING AND EVALUATION · VI. UTILIZATION AND EXPLOITATION OF THE PRESENT RECOMMENDATION · VII. PROMOTION OF THE PRESENT RECOMMENDATION · VIII. FINAL PROVISIONS
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Accountability
4/5Clear responsibility for AI outcomes
The ethical responsibility and liability for the decisions and actions based in any way on an AI system should always ultimately be attributable to AI actors corresponding to their role in the life cycle of the AI system.
III.2 PRINCIPLES
screening score · 2026-10-23
Fairness
4/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
AI actors should promote social justice and safeguard fairness and non-discrimination of any kind in compliance with international law.
III.2 PRINCIPLES
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Dignity
4/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
Therefore, respect, protection and promotion of human dignity and rights as established by international law, including international human rights law, is essential throughout the life cycle of AI systems.
III.1 VALUES
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Oversight
4/5Humans remain in control of consequential decisions
In scenarios where decisions are understood to have an impact that is irreversible or difficult to reverse or may involve life and death decisions, final human determination should apply.
III.2 PRINCIPLES
screening score · 2026-10-23
Privacy
4/5Protection of personal data and private life
Privacy, a right essential to the protection of human dignity, human autonomy and human agency, must be respected, protected and promoted throughout the life cycle of AI systems.
III.2 PRINCIPLES
screening score · 2026-10-23
Transparency
4/5Openness about how AI systems work and are used
Member States should set clear requirements for AI system transparency and explainability so as to help ensure the trustworthiness of the full AI system life cycle.
POLICY AREA 2: ETHICAL GOVERNANCE AND STEWARDSHIP
screening score · 2026-10-23
Enforcement
3/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
Member States should ensure that harms caused through AI systems are investigated and redressed, by enacting strong enforcement mechanisms and remedial actions
POLICY AREA 2: ETHICAL GOVERNANCE AND STEWARDSHIP
screening score · 2026-10-23
Impact Assessment
4/5Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use
Member States should introduce frameworks for impact assessments, such as ethical impact assessment, to identify and assess benefits, concerns and risks of AI systems
POLICY AREA 1: ETHICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
screening score · 2026-10-23