Republic of Ghana National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2025–2035
REPUBLIC OF GHANA NATIONAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE STRATEGY 2025- 2035
The Republic of Ghana National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2025-2035 is a comprehensive roadmap designed to position Ghana as a regional and continental leader in artificial intelligence. Built upon eight essential pillars, the strategy addresses education, youth empowerment, digital infrastructure, data governance, community coordination, sectoral adoption, applied research, and public sector adoption. It seeks to harness AI for sustainable and inclusive growth while establishing a Responsible AI Authority to oversee ethical deployment and implementation.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
Policymakers, government agencies, academics, private sector innovators, and civil society organizations involved in Ghana's digital and AI transformation.
What the document contains
The strategy covers national AI objectives, a diagnostic SWOT analysis of Ghana's digital ecosystem, structured action plans across eight pillars, specific use cases in key sectors like agriculture and healthcare, and institutional implementation mechanisms including the creation of a Responsible AI Authority and a National AI Fund.
Binding international treaty commitments or detailed judicial enforcement mechanisms beyond domestic institutional recommendations.
- Ghana aims to establish itself as a trailblazer for AI leadership in Africa through the National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2025-2035.
- The strategy is built upon eight essential pillars focusing on education, youth empowerment, infrastructure, data governance, community ecosystem, sectoral adoption, applied research, and public sector integration.
- An independent Responsible AI Authority (RAI Authority) will be established to lead execution, monitor progress, and coordinate stakeholders.
- The plan projects that AI will contribute 500 billion Ghanaian cedis to Ghana's GDP by 2035, supported by a National AI Fund and foreign direct investment.
- The framework aligns fully with the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence to mitigate risks such as algorithmic bias and data privacy violations.
· Foreword · List of Abbreviations · Executive Summary · Context · Mission and Vision Statements · Methodology · AI for Sustainable and Inclusive Development · Risks of AI · Diagnostic Assessment of Ghana's AI Ecosystem - SWOT Analysis · National AI Strategy Framework · Driving Implementation: Ghana's Responsible AI Authority · Action Plan (Pillars 1-8) · Conclusion
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Accountability
4/5Clear responsibility for AI outcomes
Create dedicated Data Protection and Cybersecurity Officer grades in the civil service to manage digital risks
Key Recommendations
screening score · 2026-10-23
Fairness
3/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
Algorithmic bias, the widening of digital divides, cybersecurity threats, and the misuse of personal data pose genuine ethical and societal challenges.
Foreword
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Oversight
1/5Humans remain in control of consequential decisions
develop capabilities in context-relevant human-AI collaboration to augment collaboration and shared abilities between humans and AI
Action Plan Pillar 7
screening score · 2026-10-23
Privacy
4/5Protection of personal data and private life
Ensure all government AI projects comply with national data protection and handling regulations
Key Recommendations
screening score · 2026-10-23
Enforcement
3/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
The RAI Authority shall be mandated to implement the National AI Strategy by coordinating institutional stakeholders and championing the responsible development and deployment of artificial intelligence.
Foreword
screening score · 2026-10-23
Impact Assessment
4/5Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use
Public servants should conduct an ethical impact assessment for the procurement of AI systems in government, using tools such as UNESCO’s Ethical Impact Assessment.
Pillar 8: Promote AI Adoption in Public Sector
screening score · 2026-10-23