CEIAI Governance Database
Back to the database
Record STMT-W7FBDFDAdvisory

On ethical issues of modern robotics

ОБ ЭТИЧЕСКИХ ПРОБЛЕМАХ СОВРЕМЕННОЙ РОБОТОТЕХНИКИ

Position paper Institutional policyEastern Europe · RUin force

This academic paper examines the ethical and philosophical issues arising from the rapid development of robotics and artificial intelligence systems. It focuses on specific applications such as autonomous weaponry and self-driving vehicles, discussing the moral dilemmas of delegating decision-making and responsibility to machines. The author highlights the need for separate study of these moral aspects as automated systems become more widespread.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

МГТУ им. Н.Э. БауманаAcademic
Publisher
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityInstitutional policy
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsGeneral public

Researchers, academics, and students interested in the philosophical and ethical dimensions of robotics and artificial intelligence.

Sectors
Research and science · robotics and artificial intelligence researchDefence and security · autonomous weaponryTransport and mobility · unmanned vehicles

What the document contains

What's covered

The paper addresses the ethical problems of modern robotics and artificial intelligence, focusing specifically on autonomous weaponry, unmanned vehicles, the delegation of life-and-death decisions to machines, and the attribution of responsibility.

What's missing

The document does not provide concrete legal regulations, binding frameworks, or enforced enforcement mechanisms for AI development.

Key takeaways
  • The rapid growth of robotics and AI necessitates a separate study of their moral and ethical implications.
  • Autonomous weapons present serious moral concerns due to their lack of human empathy and potential to violate concepts of humane warfare.
  • Self-driving cars create ethical dilemmas regarding liability and emergency decision-making in crash scenarios.
  • Public opinion on autonomous vehicles shows a conflict between favoring overall safety and personal risk aversion.
  • As automated systems grow more complex, the question of where accountability lies when developers cannot foresee every scenario remains open.
Principles it states
Robot cannot harm a human being or through inaction allow a human being to come to harm.Robot must obey human orders except where such orders conflict with the First Law.Robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
Outline
· Introduction to modern robotics and automation
· Historical context: Asimov's laws of robotics
· Ethical challenges of autonomous weapons
· Ethical and safety issues of autonomous vehicles
· Human mentality, social dilemmas, and control over AI
Issued1 December 2016
Length2,481 words · 7 pages
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

2/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Встает вопрос о том, кто будет нести ответственность в случае инцидентов.

Основной текст

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

1/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

Ученые хотят узнать, как суждения о социальной значимости человека могут повлиять на ответы респондентов.

Основной текст

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

Physical AI Governancecontext
roboethics autonomous_vehicles autonomous_weapons artificial_intelligence philosophy