UAE's International Stance on Artificial Intelligence Policy
The UAE's International Stance on Artificial Intelligence Policy outlines the country's strategy for shaping global AI governance, building international partnerships, and promoting responsible AI development. It establishes six core guiding principles: advancement, collaboration, community, ethics, sustainability, and safety. The document aims to position the UAE as a global AI leader while driving economic diversification and improving quality of life both domestically and internationally.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
Public and private sector entities, AI developers, consumers, and international partners looking to understand the UAE's national strategy and international stance on AI.
What the document contains
The document addresses the UAE's international AI policy objectives, foreign policy stance on emerging technologies, and six guiding principles for AI development and governance. It covers international cooperation, AI safety standards, ethical frameworks, and expected outcomes regarding economic diversification and quality of life.
The document does not provide specific legal enforcement mechanisms, binding penalties for violations, or detailed technical definitions for all mentioned AI terms.
- The policy outlines the UAE's international stance and strategic priorities regarding artificial intelligence governance.
- It establishes six core guiding principles: advancement, collaboration, community, ethics, sustainability, and safety.
- The UAE commits to active engagement in international forums to help shape global AI standards and guidelines.
- The framework supports responsible R&D and open-source contributions, such as the Falcon LLM program.
- It emphasizes transparency, accountability, and the protection of personal data and privacy within AI systems.
· Introduction · Policy Objectives · Priorities & Key Components · Expected Outcomes · Target Audience
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Accountability
3/5Clear responsibility for AI outcomes
accountability, with clear assignment of responsibility
Priorities & Key Components
screening score · 2026-10-23
Fairness
3/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
fairness, ensuring AI systems operate without bias
Priorities & Key Components
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Dignity
3/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
human values, ensuring technology respects individual dignity and rights
Priorities & Key Components
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Oversight
0/5Humans remain in control of consequential decisions
screening score · 2026-10-23
Privacy
3/5Protection of personal data and private life
privacy protection, ensuring AI systems safeguard personal data in line with the latest security standards.
Priorities & Key Components
screening score · 2026-10-23
Transparency
3/5Openness about how AI systems work and are used
transparency, ensuring decision-making processes are understandable
Priorities & Key Components
screening score · 2026-10-23
Enforcement
2/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
Emphasizes the critical importance of transparency and establishment of checkpoints within AI tools, enabling governments to ensure compliance with ethical standards and to place the necessary accountability mechanisms to address any potential violations.
Priorities & Key Components
screening score · 2026-10-23
Impact Assessment
0/5Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use
screening score · 2026-10-23