Smart Robots and Civil Liability in Jordan: A Quest for Legal Synthesis in the Age of Automation
This academic study examines the civil liability implications of artificial intelligence and smart robots within the Jordanian legal framework. Utilizing doctrinal legal research, the authors identify significant gaps in Jordan's current laws regarding AI-induced liabilities, jurisdictional ambiguities, and the limitations of traditional personal and objective liability theories. The paper proposes several reforms, including legislative intervention, the potential creation of a legal personality for AI, global accountability standards, and international cooperation.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
Legal scholars, lawmakers, and policymakers should read this to understand the legislative gaps and potential reforms needed for AI liability in Jordan.
What the document contains
The document covers the intersection of artificial intelligence and civil liability under Jordanian law, contrasting traditional liability rules with the challenges posed by autonomous smart robots and examining comparative European models.
There are no specific binding regulations, enacted statutes, or judicial precedents provided, as the text is a scholarly article proposing legal reforms.
- Jordan's current legal provisions are inadequate for addressing AI-induced civil liabilities.
- Traditional Jordanian liability theories struggle with the autonomous and unpredictable nature of artificial intelligence.
- The paper suggests exploring legal personality for AI systems akin to corporate entities.
- Comparative analysis with European legislative models offers valuable blueprints for Jordanian legislative reform.
- Establishing global accountability standards and international cooperation is crucial for managing AI risks.
· 1. Introduction · 2. Navigating AI with Traditional Theories · 3. Liability of AI in Civil Law: An Examination of the Relationship between AI and Legal Responsibility · 4. Conclusion
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Accountability
4/5Clear responsibility for AI outcomes
This study aims to bridge the jurisprudential vacuum in Jordan, where an absence of judicial precedents highlights the urgency for legal exploration in this emerging field.
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-23
Fairness
0/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Dignity
0/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
screening score · 2026-10-23
Privacy
0/5Protection of personal data and private life
screening score · 2026-10-23
Transparency
2/5Openness about how AI systems work and are used
A focus should be on creating AI that is transparent, auditable, and adheres to predefined ethical standards.
4.2 Recommendations for Establishing the Liability of AI under Jordanian Law
screening score · 2026-10-23
Enforcement
4/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
Enforcing legal obligations on multinational corporations operating AI systems in Jordan is imperative. These standards should ensure that such entities are liable for AI-induced damages
4.2 Recommendations for Establishing the Liability of AI under Jordanian Law
screening score · 2026-10-23
Impact Assessment
2/5Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use
Conducting a comprehensive feasibility study to assess establishing an independent legal personality for AI systems
1.2 Purpose and Objectives of the Study
screening score · 2026-10-23