Robot: Multiuse Tool and Ethical Agent
This academic book chapter examines the ethical, legal, and technical considerations surrounding robots as both multiuse tools and autonomous agents capable of interacting in open environments. It reviews existing ethical frameworks including the EPSRC Principles of Robotics, the STOA Making Perfect Life project, and the MEESTAR instrument to address challenges in assistive technologies and human-robot interaction. The chapter synthesizes these approaches to discuss dimensions such as care, autonomy, safety, privacy, equity, and participation.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
Researchers and developers in robotics and artificial intelligence who need a structured overview of ethical frameworks and dimensions for autonomous systems.
What the document contains
The text addresses the ethical and legal challenges of designing robots as autonomous agents and tools, focusing on human-robot interaction, technical maturity, and assistive technologies. It details evaluation instruments and guiding questions regarding care, autonomy, safety, and privacy in socio-technical systems.
The document does not provide binding legal enforcement mechanisms, statutory regulations, or specific compliance penalties.
- Robots must be considered as both technical tools and autonomous, ethically aware agents.
- Developing deployment-ready robotic systems requires addressing broad ethical, legal, and socio-technical considerations.
- The chapter integrates insights from the EPSRC Principles, STOA Making Perfect Life, and the MEESTAR instrument.
- Key ethical dimensions include care, autonomy, safety, privacy, equity, participation, and self-conception.
· Abstract · Appendix 1: MEESTAR Guiding Questions Original Formulation (German) · Appendix 2: Ethical Dimensions Assessed in MEESTAR, Original Formulation (German)
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Accountability
0/5Clear responsibility for AI outcomes
screening score · 2026-10-24
Fairness
3/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
Equity (Ge.: Gerechtigkeit) Q1: “Wer bekommt Zugang zu altersgerechten Assistenzsystemen?”
Appendix 2
screening score · 2026-10-24
Human Dignity
3/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
Autonomy/self-determination (Ge.: Selbstbestimmung) Q1: “Wie können – in Anlehnung an eine konsequent am Selbstbestimmungsrecht des Einzelnen orientierte Praxis – Menschen bei der Ausübung ihrer Selbstbestimmung unterstützt werden?”
Appendix 2
screening score · 2026-10-24
Human Oversight
0/5Humans remain in control of consequential decisions
screening score · 2026-10-24
Privacy
3/5Protection of personal data and private life
Privacy (Ge.: Privatheit) Q1: “Wie kann die Privatsphäre des Einzelnen über die informationelle Selbstbestimmung hinaus als moralischer Anspruch bei der Gestaltung altersgerechter Assistenzsysteme zur Geltung gebracht werden?”
Appendix 2
screening score · 2026-10-24
Transparency
0/5Openness about how AI systems work and are used
screening score · 2026-10-24
Enforcement
0/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
screening score · 2026-10-24
Impact Assessment
3/5Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use
Developing, building and finally deploying technology of this kind require a broad range of ethical and legal considerations
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-24