Authorizing robots with artificial intelligence to conclude legal actions
This academic study examines the legal status and viability of empowering AI-equipped robots to execute legal actions and contracts under Iraqi civil law. It analyzes the concept of agency in relation to autonomous machines, highlighting the limitations of granting legal personality or agency to systems lacking human consciousness and independent will. Finally, the authors propose legislative amendments, including redefining electronic agency concepts and establishing clear liability frameworks for actions performed by artificial intelligence.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
Legal scholars, legislators, and researchers interested in the intersection of artificial intelligence and civil contract law.
What the document contains
The document addresses the legal admissibility of AI-driven robots concluding contracts, examines whether such machines can act as agents, and analyzes liability issues under Iraqi civil law.
The text does not provide binding regulatory enforcement mechanisms, international governance treaties, or technical safety standards for robotic development.
- AI robots lack human consciousness and independent will, meaning they cannot independently possess legal personality or true agency.
- Granting legal personality to AI would inappropriately shield manufacturers and users from legal responsibility.
- Iraqi civil law provisions on agency and electronic signatures require revision to adequately address automated systems.
- The study recommends replacing the term electronic medium with messenger in relevant legal provisions to maintain accurate legal representation.
· Abstract · 1. Introduction · 2. General framework of smart robots and their legal importance · 3. The status of AI robots in the balance of agency · 4. Conclusion and Recommendations
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Fairness
0/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Dignity
0/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-23
Privacy
0/5Protection of personal data and private life
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-23
Enforcement
0/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-23
Impact Assessment
0/5Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use
Abstract
screening score · 2026-10-23