Back to the database
Record STMT-W65136DVoluntary

Embedding responsible innovation into R&D practices: A case study of socially assistive robot development

Report International lawEuropein force

This study examines the challenges of embedding responsible innovation (RI) into research and development practices within a three-year project developing a socially assistive robot. Using participatory action research (PAR), the authors fostered collective learning and identified four key barriers: lack of an action perspective, the noncommittal nature of RI, the misconception that co-design equals RI, and limited integration between R&D task groups. The paper concludes with recommendations for R&D teams and funding bodies to better institutionalize RI.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Informa UK Limited (Taylor & Francis Group)Industry · GB
Publisher
Legal forceVoluntary
Under whose authorityInternational law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsNational governmentAI developers and providers

Researchers, developers, and funding bodies involved in healthcare technology and artificial intelligence who wish to understand how to practically implement responsible innovation.

Sectors
Research and science · robotics research and developmentHealthcare · long-term care for older adults

What the document contains

What's covered

The paper addresses the practical implementation of responsible innovation principles within a digital healthcare and robotics research project, analyzing methods like participatory action research and evaluating the specific organizational barriers encountered.

What's missing

The text does not provide a legally binding regulatory framework, formal enforcement mechanisms, or comprehensive technical specifications for commercial robot deployment.

Key takeaways
  • Embedding responsible innovation into R&D practices faces significant structural and practical barriers.
  • Participatory action research can facilitate collective learning and modest, deliberate actions regarding RI.
  • Four primary barriers hampered RI integration: lack of action perspective, noncommittal nature of RI, confusing co-design with RI, and limited cross-group integration.
  • Funding bodies and R&D teams must collaborate to establish stronger, more committed frameworks for responsible innovation.
Principles it states
anticipation of potential positive and negative implicationsinclusion of users and other stakeholdersreflexivity of actors in their own practices, assumptions, values, and interestsresponsiveness to insights that emerge during the innovation process
Outline
· Introduction
· Participatory action research to study RI in a R&D project: methods and materials
· Barriers to embedding RI in R&D practices
· Discussion
· Conclusion
Issued1 September 2024
Length5,984 words · 12 pages
FormatNot recorded
Scoperegional

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

N/A

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

responsible_innovation socially_assistive_robots participatory_action_research ai_ethics research_and_development