Engineering-Based Design Methodology for Embedding Ethics in Autonomous Robots
This paper explores an engineering-based co-design methodology for embedding ethics into the design of autonomous robotic systems, specifically applied to biomedical devices like robotic capsule endoscopes. It introduces a theory of exposure to evaluate end-user vulnerability and system weaknesses as an alternative to traditional risk assessments. The research discusses how to align levels of robotic autonomy with ethical decision-making capabilities during the preclinical design phase.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
Engineers, researchers, and designers working on autonomous systems and biomedical robotics who need methodologies for incorporating ethical considerations into system architecture.
What the document contains
The paper covers an academic framework for embedding ethical considerations into the engineering and design process of autonomous robots. It addresses stakeholder selection, co-design methodologies, alignment of autonomy levels with ethical agency, and exposure analysis using robotic capsule endoscopy as a case study.
The document does not provide a mandatory regulatory compliance framework, binding legal statutes, or enforcement mechanisms for industrial developers.
- An ethically aligned co-design methodology can be integrated into the preclinical engineering design phase of autonomous robotic systems.
- Evaluating system 'exposure' provides a more rigorous measure of end-user vulnerability than traditional aggregated risk matrices.
- The level of autonomy granted to a robotic system must be carefully aligned with its capacity to recognize and respond to ethical situations.
- Biomedical autonomous systems, such as robotic endoscopic capsules, benefit from multi-stakeholder engagement throughout the design process to minimize harm and enhance wellbeing.
· I. Introduction · II. Ethical Co-Design: A Philosophical Approach · III. Proposed Co-Design Methodology · IV. Case Study - Modern Endoscopy and Robotic Capsule Endoscopy · V. Conclusion
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Fairness
0/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
N/A
screening score · 2026-10-23
Enforcement
0/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
N/A
screening score · 2026-10-23