A Model for Calculating Cost of Applying Electronic Governance and Robotic Process Automation to a Distributed Management System
This research paper presents a mathematical model for calculating the cost of accomplishing tasks using electronic governance (eGov) and robotic process automation (RPA) within a distributed management system. The authors extend existing organizational economic models to account for both human and bot employees across different organizational hierarchy levels and skill sets. The model aims to provide a formal cost-analysis approach to help organizations evaluate the efficiency gains and expenses of implementing these technologies.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
Researchers and organizational analysts looking for a mathematical model to evaluate the costs of electronic governance and robotic process automation.
What the document contains
The document covers a theoretical mathematical framework for calculating labor, bot, and processing costs in a hierarchical and distributed organization utilizing electronic governance and robotic process automation tools.
The text does not provide regulatory compliance guidelines, legal definitions, policy enforcement mechanisms, or sector-specific deployment mandates.
- The paper introduces a mathematical model to calculate the cost of task execution when applying electronic governance and robotic process automation in distributed management systems.
- The model incorporates both human and bot employees by factoring in organizational depth, employee skill levels, wage costs, and proportionate time contributions.
- Electronic governance and robotic process automation can improve organizational efficiency, productivity, and agility, but also introduce implementation and infrastructure costs.
- The proposed cost model is designed to spark further research on economic performance and organizational efficiency in light of advanced automation technologies.
· 1 Introduction · 2 Cost Calculation Model · 3 Conclusions · 4 Authors’ Contributions
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Accountability
1/5Clear responsibility for AI outcomes
as well as the need for clear guidelines and protocols for decision-making and accountability.
1 Introduction
screening score · 2026-10-23
Fairness
0/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Dignity
0/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Oversight
0/5Humans remain in control of consequential decisions
screening score · 2026-10-23
Transparency
1/5Openness about how AI systems work and are used
enhance the operational efficiency and transparency of the organization
1 Introduction
screening score · 2026-10-23
Enforcement
0/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
screening score · 2026-10-23
Impact Assessment
0/5Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use
screening score · 2026-10-23