Back to the database
Record STMT-W4540D5Unknown

Ageism in artificial intelligence for health

Report UnknownGlobaladopted

This World Health Organization report examines how ageism manifests within artificial intelligence applications designed for health care. It analyses potential biases against older populations in AI-driven health technologies and offers guidance on ensuring age-inclusive design and deployment. The document provides recommendations for stakeholders across the health and technology sectors to prevent discrimination and promote equitable health outcomes for older adults.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

World Health OrganizationIntergovernmental
Lead issuer
Legal forceUnknown
Under whose authorityUnknown
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

AI developers and providersPublic sector bodiesAI deployers and usersResearchers and academics

Developers, policymakers, and health professionals seeking to understand and mitigate age-related biases in health AI technologies.

Sectors
Healthcare · healthResearch and science

What the document contains

What's covered

The document addresses the intersection of age discrimination and health-related artificial intelligence, highlighting risks to older adults and outlining ethical considerations for developers and policymakers.

What's missing

The text does not provide binding legal enforcement mechanisms, technical software code standards, or formal regulatory penalties.

Key takeaways
  • Artificial intelligence in health can perpetuate or exacerbate ageism if not carefully designed and regulated.
  • Older adults risk being excluded from datasets, leading to less effective or biased health technologies.
  • Inclusive design principles must be integrated throughout the AI lifecycle in healthcare.
  • Policymakers and developers share responsibility for safeguarding the rights and health outcomes of older populations.
Outline
Not stated
Issued2022
Length335 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

n/a

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

n/a

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

n/a

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

n/a

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

n/a

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

n/a

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

n/a

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

n/a

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

ageism healthcare_ai ethics health_equity bias