CEIAI Governance Database
Back to the database
Record STMT-W43025BAdvisory

International Scientific Exchange on AI Safety (ISE) | IMDA

Framework Institutional policySouth-eastern Asia · SGin force

This document outlines Singapore's International Scientific Exchange on AI Safety, detailing collaborative research, scientific exchange, and safety standards for artificial intelligence. It emphasizes international cooperation to foster safe, secure, and trustworthy AI ecosystems. The framework highlights key technical mechanisms and shared responsibilities for researchers and developers.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Infocomm Media Development AuthorityGovernment
Lead issuer
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityInstitutional policy
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsNational governmentAI developers and providersInternational community

Researchers, developers, and policymakers interested in international AI safety collaboration.

Sectors
Telecommunications and digital services · artificial intelligenceResearch and science · scientific exchange

What the document contains

What's covered

The document addresses international scientific exchange on AI safety, collaborative safety research, and standards alignment across jurisdictions.

What's missing

Specific legal enforcement mechanisms and detailed compliance penalties are not stated.

Key takeaways
  • International scientific exchange is vital for ensuring AI safety and trustworthiness.
  • Collaboration among global researchers helps establish common safety standards.
  • The framework supports transparent and responsible AI development.
Principles it states
Safety and security by designInternational collaboration and transparency
Outline
· Overview of International Scientific Exchange on AI Safety
· Collaborative Research and Development
· Safety Standards and Alignment
IssuedNot recorded
Length647 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

ai_safety international_cooperation research_and_development trustworthy_ai