CEIAI Governance Database
Back to the database
Record STMT-W37437FAdvisory

Ethical Issues in the Design of Unmanned Systems for Military Applications

White paper ProfessionalGlobalin force

This academic book chapter examines the ethical issues involved in the design of unmanned systems for military applications. It organizes these challenges under two main headings: building safe systems and designing for compliance with the law of armed conflict. The text analyzes the implications of these issues and discusses potential ways they might be addressed by designers.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

SpringerIndustry
Publisher
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityProfessional
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsNational governmentAI developers and providers

Researchers, military technologists, and ethicists studying the implications of autonomous military systems should read this chapter.

Sectors
Defence and security · military applicationsResearch and science

What the document contains

What's covered

The chapter addresses the ethical challenges and requirements involved in designing military unmanned systems, focusing specifically on safety considerations and adherence to the law of armed conflict.

What's missing

Specific regulatory enforcement mechanisms, technical software code, and legally binding international treaties are not found in this text.

Key takeaways
  • Military unmanned systems designers must consider ethical and operational requirements.
  • Ethical issues in unmanned system design fall under building safe systems and designing for the law of armed conflict.
  • Unmanned systems play a critical role in combat mission success and decisions regarding life and death.
Outline
· Abstract
· Building Safe Systems
· Designing for the Law of Armed Conflict
Issued17 February 2023
Length2,190 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

1/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

Designers of UMS must therefore consider ethical, as well as operational, requirements and limits when developing UMS.

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

Physical AI Governancesupporting
military_ai autonomous_weapons robotics_ethics armed_conflict system_safety