Back to the database
Record STMT-W27A74BAdvisory

The Challenges and Opportunities of Artificial Intelligence in Implementing Trustworthy Robotics and Autonomous Systems

The Challenges and Opportunities of Artificial Intelligence in Implementing Trustworthy Robotics and Autonomous Systems

Report State lawGlobalin force

This review paper analyzes the challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence in implementing trustworthy robots and autonomous systems (RAS). It identifies four key properties required for trustworthiness—robustness for health issues, safety in surrounding environments, cyber security, and trusted human-machine interaction—while examining how AI techniques can help address these challenges. The study emphasizes the emerging concept of human-centred AI as core to building fully trustworthy autonomous systems.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Cranfield UniversityAcademic · GB
Lead issuer
University of ManchesterAcademic · GB
Co-issuer
Loughborough UniversityAcademic · GB
Co-issuer
Nottingham Trent UniversityAcademic · GB
Co-issuer
University of StrathclydeAcademic
Co-issuer
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityState law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsCompaniesAI developers and providersAI deployers and users

Researchers, developers, and engineers working on artificial intelligence, robotics, and autonomous systems seeking an overview of trustworthiness requirements and technical challenges.

Sectors
Research and science · robotics and autonomous systemsTransport and mobility · connected and autonomous vehicles

What the document contains

What's covered

The document covers the fundamental requirements, technical challenges, and AI-driven solutions for establishing trustworthiness in robots and autonomous systems. It specifically examines cyber security vulnerabilities, safety hazards, health maintenance and fault diagnosis, and human-machine interaction.

What's missing

The document does not provide binding legal regulations, formal compliance certification schemes, or specific enforcement mechanisms.

Key takeaways
  • Effective robots and autonomous systems (RAS) must be trustworthy, adhering to the principle that 'No trust, no use'.
  • Trustworthiness in RAS depends on four key properties: health robustness, environmental safety, cyber security, and trusted human-machine interaction.
  • While AI offers powerful capabilities for automation, threat detection, and fault diagnosis, it also introduces potential risks such as adversarial vulnerabilities and biased decision-making.
  • Human-centred AI (HAI) serves as a vital core framework to ensure that next-generation intelligent systems reflect human intelligence and enhance rather than replace human capabilities.
Principles it states
Security by DesignPrivacy by DesignDesign for ErrorWhen all else fails, standardize
Outline
· I. Introduction
· II. Key factors that affect RAS' trustworthiness
· III. The challenges in implementing trustworthy RAS
· IV. The opportunities of AI technology
· V. Conclusions
Issued2020
Length7,338 words · 8 pages
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

2/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

Machine learning-based AI systems trained with incomplete or distorted data (i.e. their “worldview”) can lead to biased “thinking,” which may in turn magnify prejudice and inequality

V. Conclusions

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

3/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

The new concept of human-centred AI will be the core in implementing the trustworthy RAS.

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

4/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

No matter which level a system’s autonomy is at, human should be able to interrupt the system, even if the execution of autonomous systems does not need to have the intervention of human

II. Key Factors That Affect RAS’ Trustworthiness

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

3/5

Protection of personal data and private life

The privacy of RAS is a branch of security, which focuses on the data protection, especially, personal information protection, and regulation compliance (e.g. GDPR).

II. Key Factors That Affect RAS’ Trustworthiness

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

2/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Through the intuitive and efficient visualization of sensed quantities, estimated statistics, and the automatic identification of trends over time, both users and the system could be better informed on their conditions

II. Key Factors That Affect RAS’ Trustworthiness

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

2/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

While we put our eyes on the benefits that AI brings to human, we should realise the potential risks that could be caused by AI.

Abstract

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

robotics trustworthy_ai cyber_security safety human_robot_interaction