Back to the database
Record STMT-W1BF791Advisory

The Inherent Dangers of Unidirectional Emotional Bonds between Humans and Social Robots

Position paper Professionalunknown

This academic paper examines the ethical risks posed by unidirectional emotional bonds between humans and autonomous social robots. It highlights how social machines might exploit human emotional propensities without true reciprocity and suggests requiring robots to include affect-processing mechanisms to counter these threats.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Indiana University BloomingtonAcademic
Lead issuer
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityProfessional
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsGeneral publicCompanies

Researchers, developers, and ethicists interested in the societal and psychological impacts of human-robot interaction.

Sectors
Research and science · cognitive science and human-robot interaction

What the document contains

What's covered

The paper addresses the potential harms of unidirectional emotional bonding between humans and social robots, the risks of emotional manipulation due to lack of robot reciprocity, and a proposed architectural solution involving affect-processing mechanisms.

What's missing

The text does not provide specific legal regulations, enforcement mechanisms, or formal policy definitions.

Key takeaways
  • Autonomous social robots are increasingly entering personal human spaces and prompting humans to ascribe agency and form emotional attachments.
  • Unidirectional emotional bonds with robots lack proper reciprocity and create vulnerabilities, such as potential manipulation or exploitation by malicious actors.
  • While social robots offer substantial benefits for elder care and therapy, their potential detrimental societal consequences must be evaluated.
  • To counter threats arising from unreciprocated emotional exploitation, complex robotic architectures could be required to include affect-processing mechanisms.
Outline
Not stated
Issued25 November 2015
Length495 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

1

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

1

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

2/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

negatively impact and possibly completely destroy human societies by virtue of being able to exploit human innate emotional mechanisms

1

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

1

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

1

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

1

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

1

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

2/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

we will need a thorough investigation of the potential harm that social robots could cause to humans and the repercussions for society

1

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

social_robots emotional_attachment robot_ethics human_robot_interaction autonomous_agents
The Inherent Dangers of Unidirectional Emotional Bonds between Humans and Social Robots · CEI AI Governance Database