Enterprise AI Strategy FY2024 - FY2025: Empowering Diplomacy through Responsible AI
ENTERPRISE AI STRATEGY FY2024 - FY2025 Empowering Diplomacy through Responsible AI
The Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Strategy (EAIS) FY2024 - FY2025 outlines the U.S. Department of State's framework for responsibly and securely harnessing artificial intelligence to advance diplomacy and statecraft. It establishes four core goals: leveraging secure AI infrastructure, fostering an AI-embracing workforce culture, ensuring AI is applied responsibly through robust governance, and actively innovating and scaling successful solutions. The strategy aims to empower diplomats with advanced technical tools while mitigating risks related to security, privacy, and bias.
Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.
Who issued it
Who it governs
Department of State personnel, leadership, developers, and partners looking to understand how AI will be adopted and governed within U.S. diplomacy.
What the document contains
The strategy covers the integration of artificial intelligence into the U.S. Department of State's operations, focusing on secure infrastructure, workforce training and culture, responsible AI governance and risk management, and innovation through experimentation and scaling.
The document does not provide specific binding legislation, civil penalties, or detailed technical specifications for individual software applications.
- The U.S. Department of State aims to responsibly harness artificial intelligence to advance diplomacy, foreign policy analysis, and management efficiency.
- Goal 1 focuses on integrating AI technologies into a secure, sustainable, and scalable technological infrastructure aligned with Zero Trust principles.
- Goal 2 emphasizes building a well-trained workforce with high AI literacy through specialized learning opportunities and recruitment of technical talent.
- Goal 3 establishes robust AI governance, risk management, and data quality assurance to ensure trustworthy and ethical AI use across the enterprise.
- Goal 4 drives entrepreneurial experimentation and innovation through controlled sandbox environments and external partnerships with responsible AI innovators.
· Letter from the Secretary of State · Executive Summary · Introduction · Strategic Drivers · Department of State AI Vision · Strategic Goals and Objectives - GOAL 1: Leverage Secure AI Infrastructure - GOAL 2: Foster a Culture that Embraces AI Technology - GOAL 3: Ensure AI is Applied Responsibly - GOAL 4: Innovate · Moving Forward
How it scores
Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.
Accountability
3/5Clear responsibility for AI outcomes
The Department’s Enterprise Governance Board, AI Steering Committee, and Responsible AI Official, among many others, will work diligently to advance ethical and effective AI in the Department
Letter from the Secretary of State
screening score · 2026-10-23
Fairness
3/5Non-discrimination and equitable treatment
Establish the enterprise capacity to ensure trustworthy and ethical AI use; ensure data privacy and security, manage algorithmic risk; reduce harm, bias, and inequity
Goal 3
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Dignity
1/5Respect for the inherent worth of persons
protect individuals
Introduction
screening score · 2026-10-23
Human Oversight
1/5Humans remain in control of consequential decisions
regular safety and trustworthy assessments and internal audits will be required to manage risks, both in isolation and because of human users
Goal 3
screening score · 2026-10-23
Privacy
3/5Protection of personal data and private life
This opportunity will require the Department to take steps to protect individuals and manage risks, including the security and privacy of Department data
Introduction
screening score · 2026-10-23
Transparency
3/5Openness about how AI systems work and are used
The Department must have policy, guidelines, and technologies to facilitate transparent, responsible, and ethical use of applied AI
Goal 3
screening score · 2026-10-23
Enforcement
2/5Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force
AI compliance plans and protocols for system maintenance, recalibration, and use stoppage will prevent unintended bias and functionality.
Goal 3
screening score · 2026-10-23
Impact Assessment
4/5Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use
Prior to their acquisition, AI technologies will be evaluated against security protocols and risk assessment processes.
Goal 1
screening score · 2026-10-23