CEIAI Governance Database
Back to the database
Record STMT-W13E39BLegally binding

Civil liability for robot errors

المسؤولية المدنية عن أخطاء الروبوت

Report State lawAfrica · DZin force

This academic paper examines civil liability for robot and artificial intelligence errors under Algerian civil law, analyzing the inadequacy of traditional legal frameworks such as master-servant relationships and property custody. It explores modern alternatives, including the European 'Responsible Human Agent' theory, and discusses compensation rules and the validity of liability exemption clauses. Ultimately, the study advocates for a dedicated legal framework and specialized judicial mechanisms to address robot-induced damages.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

Université Mohamed Boudiaf de M'silaAcademic · DZ
Publisher
Legal forceLegally binding
Under whose authorityState law
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsNational governmentRegulators

Researchers, legal scholars, and policymakers interested in the intersection of civil law, robotics, and artificial intelligence liability.

Sectors
Cross-sector

What the document contains

What's covered

The paper covers the legal classification of robots under traditional civil law theories (custody, agency, master-servant), modern concepts like the European 'human agent' model, and the rules governing compensation and liability exemptions for robot errors.

What's missing

It lacks binding legislative enactments or formal statutory regulations, serving instead as an academic analysis and proposal for future legal reform.

Key takeaways
  • Current legislative frameworks in Algerian civil law are insufficient to cover all damages caused by autonomous robots.
  • Applying traditional legal theories like master-servant or property custody to robots presents significant doctrinal hurdles.
  • The European 'Responsible Human Agent' model assigns liability across manufacturers, operators, users, and owners.
  • Contractual liability exemptions are permissible under certain conditions, whereas tort liability exemptions are void.
  • The authors recommend creating specialized courts, dedicated compensation funds, and specific AI legislation.
Outline
· مقدمة
· المبحث الأول: الأساس القانوني للمسؤولية المدنية الناجمة عن أخطاء الروبوت
· المبحث الثاني: نتائج تحديد المسؤول عن الخطأ الصادر عن استخدام الروبوت
· الخاتمة
Issued29 December 2025
Length9,742 words · 26 pages
FormatNot recorded
Scopenational

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

4/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

يتحمل مسؤوليته تجاه المضرور، من أجل جبر الضرر الذي أصابه من جراء استخدام تقنية الروبوت، سواء كان عينيا أو تعويضيا بمقابل

المطلب الأول: التعويض الناتج عن أضرار الروبوت

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

4/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

يتضمن هذا الغرض الجمع بين المسؤولية الصارمة وإدارة المخاطر، مما يظهر في توصيات اللجنة البرلمانية الأوروبية بشأن الروبوتات في عام 2017

الفرع الثاني : تكييف المسؤولية المدنية على فكرة النائب الانساني

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

Physical AI Governancesupporting
civil_liability robotics artificial_intelligence compensation tort_law