Back to the database
Record STMT-W0DF6B1Aspirational

ToP-ToM: Trust-aware Robot Policy with Theory of Mind

Position paper Institutional policyGlobaladopted

This research paper investigates a trust-aware robot policy incorporating a Theory of Mind (ToM) model in a multiagent human-robot collaboration setting. The authors demonstrate that optimizing solely for team performance can lead a robot to utilize reverse psychology, which threatens human trust and may cause trust collapse. To mitigate this issue, the proposed ToP-ToM model uses a robot ToM framework to infer human trust beliefs and dynamically adjust the reward function during reinforcement learning. Experimental results in a card game simulation show that ToP-ToM effectively balances human trust maintenance and overall team performance.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

arXivAcademic
Publisher
Legal forceAspirational
Under whose authorityInstitutional policy
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

Researchers and academicsAI developers and providers

AI and robotics researchers interested in modeling human-robot trust and Theory of Mind in multiagent systems.

Sectors
Research and science · robotics and artificial intelligence research

What the document contains

What's covered

The paper covers the design and evaluation of a trust-aware robot policy using Theory of Mind (ToP-ToM) within a multiagent simulation environment. It models human trust dynamics and behavioral policies using Beta distributions and risk coefficients, and evaluates four different robot decision strategies.

What's missing

The paper does not test the proposed model with actual human participants in physical robotic settings, nor does it provide legal or regulatory governance frameworks.

Key takeaways
  • Optimizing robot policies strictly for team performance can cause robots to employ reverse psychology, risking human trust collapse.
  • The proposed ToP-ToM model integrates human trust beliefs, including true and false beliefs, into the robot's decision-making process.
  • A dynamic trust-aware reward function helps balance trust maintenance and team performance during human-robot collaboration.
  • Offline reinforcement learning using Conservative Q-Learning (CQL) effectively trains trust-aware robot decision models from static interaction data.
Outline
· I. Introduction
· II. Related Works
· III. Methodology
· IV. Simulation Results
· V. Conclusions and Discussion
Issued7 November 2023
Length5,695 words · 7 pages
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

0/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

screening score · 2026-10-24

Fairness

0/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Dignity

0/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

screening score · 2026-10-24

Human Oversight

0/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

screening score · 2026-10-24

Privacy

0/5

Protection of personal data and private life

screening score · 2026-10-24

Transparency

0/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

screening score · 2026-10-24

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

screening score · 2026-10-24

Impact Assessment

0/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

screening score · 2026-10-24

Topics

robotics theory_of_mind trust_aware_ai reinforcement_learning human_robot_interaction