Back to the database
Record STMT-M170Advisory

Statement on the Unregulated Development of Artificial Intelligence

Statement Institutional policyGlobaladopted

The World Council of Churches central committee expresses deep concern regarding the accelerating, unregulated development of generative artificial intelligence. The statement calls on governments to urgently establish strong and binding regulatory regimes, legal liability frameworks, and international normative standards. It also invites member churches and ecumenical partners to engage in theological reflection and advocate for ethical AI governance.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

World Council of ChurchesReligious
Lead issuer
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityInstitutional policy
Judged fromfull text

Who it governs

National governmentAI developers and providersAI deployers and usersReligious communityInternational community

Governments, international bodies, religious communities, and tech developers should read this to understand ethical concerns and policy appeals regarding AI.

Sectors
Cross-sectorReligion and culture

What the document contains

What's covered

The document addresses the risks of unregulated generative artificial intelligence, calls for national and international regulatory frameworks and legal liability, and outlines the theological and ethical concerns of the ecumenical movement.

What's missing

It does not provide specific technical standards, detailed legislative text, or numerical thresholds for computational power.

Key takeaways
  • The rapid development of generative AI is driven primarily by commercial interests rather than the common good.
  • Unregulated AI poses significant risks including algorithmic bias, misinformation, mass surveillance, and autonomous weapons systems.
  • Governments must urgently establish strong, binding regulatory regimes and legal liability frameworks based on the precautionary principle.
  • The UN Secretary-General should prioritize advanced AI regulation within the New Agenda for Peace.
  • Churches and ecumenical partners are urged to engage in theological reflection and advocate for swift regulatory action.
Outline
· Expression of concern regarding the accelerating pace and commercial drivers of generative AI
· Recognition of positive potential alongside grave risks such as algorithmic bias, misinformation, unemployment, and autonomous weapons
· Christian theological perspectives and challenges to church ministry and theology
· Specific appeals to governments, the UN, and WCC member churches regarding regulation and accountability
Issued26 June 2023
Length1,643 words
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

4/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Encourages the development of legal liability frameworks to hold those who develop and deploy AI systems legally responsible for resulting harms.

The WCC central committee therefore

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

3/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

including algorithmic bias entrenching discrimination based on race and gender, and the amplification of divisive and destructive misinformation

Statement

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

5/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

draw on the legacy of Christian theology and anthropology in order to critically and constructively contribute to the public discourse on this matter and to counter a modern form of idolatry

Statement

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

3/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

the development of autonomous weapons systems (‘killer robots’) able to function without meaningful human control

Statement

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

2/5

Protection of personal data and private life

enhanced capacities for surveillance and repression

Statement

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

3/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

aiming to ensure that AI systems are overseen by human beings, are safe, transparent, traceable, non-discriminatory

Statement

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

4/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

Appeals to all governments urgently to establish strong and binding regulatory regimes based on the precautionary principle

The WCC central committee therefore

screening score · 2026-10-23

Impact Assessment

3/5

Required assessment of an AI system's risks/impacts before or during use

We note and will monitor the current developments at European Union level towards the first ever regulatory framework for AI

Statement

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

artificial_intelligence ethics regulation theology human_rights
Statement on the Unregulated Development of Artificial Intelligence · CEI AI Governance Database