CEIAI Governance Database
Back to the database
Record STMT-M002Advisory

Governing AI for Humanity: Final Report

Report International lawGlobaladopted

This final report by the UN High-Level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence outlines the urgent need for a holistic, global approach to governing AI for humanity. It identifies critical governance gaps regarding representation, coordination, and implementation on an international scale. To address these challenges, the report recommends enhancing global cooperation through mechanisms like an international scientific panel on AI, regular policy dialogues, standards exchanges, and a dedicated UN AI office.

Summary and content fields are drawn from the document text and are pending editorial review.

Who issued it

United NationsIntergovernmental
Lead issuer
Legal forceAdvisory
Under whose authorityInternational law
Judged fromabstract

Who it governs

International communityNational governmentRegulatorsAI developers and providersResearchers and academics

Policymakers, international organizations, technology developers, and researchers seeking a blueprint for global AI governance and cooperation.

Sectors
Cross-sector

What the document contains

What's covered

The document addresses the global governance challenges and opportunities presented by artificial intelligence, detailing existing gaps in representation, coordination, and implementation. It proposes a comprehensive framework for international cooperation consisting of common understanding, common ground, and common benefits. Specific institutional recommendations include a scientific panel, policy dialogues, a standards exchange, capacity development initiatives, a global fund, a data framework, and a dedicated UN AI office.

What's missing

The report does not establish legally binding international treaties or enforcement mechanisms, leaving actual implementation and regulation to national governments and regional bodies.

Key takeaways
  • Artificial intelligence offers tremendous potential for advancing the Sustainable Development Goals, but left ungoverned, its benefits will be unevenly distributed.
  • A massive global governance deficit exists, characterized by severe gaps in representation, coordination, and implementation.
  • The transboundary nature of AI necessitates a holistic, globally networked approach rather than fragmented national and regional initiatives.
  • An independent international scientific panel on AI should be established to provide impartial scientific consensus and risk assessments.
  • Global institutional mechanisms—including a policy dialogue, standards exchange, capacity development network, and global fund—are required to ensure equitable benefits.
Principles it states
AI should be governed inclusively, by and for the benefit of all.AI must be governed in the public interest.AI governance should be built in step with data governance and the promotion of data commons.AI governance must be universal, networked and rooted in adaptive multi-stakeholder collaboration.AI governance should be anchored in the Charter of the United Nations, international human rights law and other agreed international commitments, such as the SDGs.
Outline
· Executive summary
· 1. The need for global governance
· 2. Global AI governance gaps
· 3. Enhancing global cooperation
· 4. A call to action
IssuedSeptember 2024
Length2,973 words · 101 pages
FormatNot recorded
Scopeglobal

How it scores

Pending review

Each score is backed by a quote verified against the document text. Editorial review has not yet confirmed them.

Accountability

2/5

Clear responsibility for AI outcomes

Accountability is often notable for its absence, including for deploying non-explainable AI systems that impact others.

Executive summary

screening score · 2026-10-23

Fairness

2/5

Non-discrimination and equitable treatment

Left ungoverned, however, AI’s opportunities may not manifest or be distributed equitably. Widening digital divides could limit the benefits of AI to a handful of States, companies and individuals.

Executive summary

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Dignity

3/5

Respect for the inherent worth of persons

Such an approach can turn a patchwork of evolving initiatives into a coherent, interoperable whole, grounded in international law and the SDGs, adaptable across contexts and over time.

Section 1

screening score · 2026-10-23

Human Oversight

2/5

Humans remain in control of consequential decisions

Moreover, no one currently understands all of AI’s inner workings enough to fully control its outputs or predict its evolution.

Section 1

screening score · 2026-10-23

Privacy

1/5

Protection of personal data and private life

AI bias and surveillance are joined by newer concerns, such as the confabulations (or “hallucinations”) of large language models

Executive summary

screening score · 2026-10-23

Transparency

3/5

Openness about how AI systems work and are used

Fast, opaque and autonomous AI systems challenge traditional regulatory systems, while ever-more-powerful systems could upend the world of work.

Executive summary

screening score · 2026-10-23

Enforcement

0/5

Consequences and compliance mechanisms with real force

Executive summary

screening score · 2026-10-23

Topics

artificial_intelligence global_governance international_cooperation risk_management capacity_building